The Catholic Univesity of Eastern Africa Digital Repository >
Faculty of Education >
Theses and Dissertations >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost/xmlui/handle/1/87
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | MWALW’A, SHEM NGAAMBA | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-09T12:08:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-02-09T12:08:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-02-09 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost/xmlui/handle/1/87 | - |
dc.description | This evaluationis my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other
university. No part of this evaluationmay be reproduced without the prior permission of the
author and/or the Catholic University of Eastern Africa. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In order to meet the need for teacher development and achieve professional enhancement among
teachers, many universities worldwide, the ones in Kenya included, have adopted Bachelor of
Education school-based programmes. The programmes are a mode of delivery that conveniently
fits into the teachers’ professional calendar because they are conducted during the school
holidays when teachers are not required in their posting stations. Africa Nazarene University
(ANU) and Egerton University (private and public universities respectively) are examples of
universities in Kenya that have embraced the Bachelor of Education school-based programmes.
Even though the implementation of these programmes has been in progress for some time, no
evaluation had been conducted to determine the progress of the process. This evaluation was
conducted in order to determine whether the implementation process of the school-based
programmes at Africa Nazarene and Egerton Universities was being carried out appropriately,
establish any challenges encountered in the implementation process as well as suggest ways of
overcoming those difficulties. The evaluation employeda combination of both qualitative and
quantitative research paradigms. The quantitative paradigm involved descriptive statistics as well
as ex post facto designs while the qualitative (naturalistic) paradigm comprised of comparisons
and discussion of data especially collected through interviews and checklists. This evaluation
adopted the Context Input, Process and Product (CIPP) model whose key proponent is Daniel
Stufflebeam (1971) but did not deal with the product stage because it was a formative evaluation
dealing with the evaluation of the implementation process. The target population were university
school-based students, lecturers, co-ordinators and HOD’s of those programmes in ANU and
Egerton Universtiy.All the respondents targeted were from the faculties/schools of education in
the respective universities.Proportionate sampling techniques devised by Yamane were used to
obtain the student sample for study. Data was collected using questionnaires, interview guides,
checklist and document analysis guide. In order to ensure reliability of the instruments, the
researcher used split half for pilot testing, then the scores obtained from the likert scale items
were subjected to Cronbach alpha coefficient. Scores obtained from the items that were not in the
likert scale were subjected to Spearman- Brown coefficient. A reliability coefficient index of
0.83 was obtained in both cases respectively. Both qualitative and quantitative data analysis
procedures were used to analyse data. Quantitative data was analysed using the Statistical
Package for Social Scientists (SPSS). Quantitative data analysis largely involved inferential
statistics (particularly t-test) and descriptive statistics, specifically; distribution tables,
frequencies and percentages. In order to be able to effectively analyse qualitative data, the
researcher adopted the thematic analysis to identify expected and unexpected theme categories
reflected in the data which he then constructed into narratives. The findings of the study revealed
that the teaching methods and techniques used in the school-based programme were appropriate
but a variety of teaching approaches needed to be employed in teaching, students and lecturers
needed to be better prepared variously for the sessions, resources were available but not adequate
and that there were administrative and other challenges harbouring proper implementation of the
programme. Even though differences were noted between ANU and Egerton University in their
implementation process, they were not significant. The evaluator recommended that
improvements needed to be done in the areas that had been highlighted with challenges. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | The Catholic University of Eastern Africa | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | SCHOOL-BASED TEACHER EDUCATION-Kenya | en_US |
dc.subject | AFRICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY | en_US |
dc.subject | EGERTON UNIVERSITY | en_US |
dc.subject | School-focused programmes | en_US |
dc.subject | PhD Dissertation- The Catholic University of Eastern Africa | - |
dc.title | COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHOOLBASED TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMME IN AFRICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY AND EGERTON UNIVERSITY, KENYA. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Theses and Dissertations
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|